May 04

NetSquared project part 1

2006 at 06.01 am posted by Veerle

Regular visitors will know that from time to time I write about some projects that we worked on. So today I like to introduce NetSquared. I was very excited to jump into this project because it was one those occasions that I had the opportunity to create a brand/identity from scratch. This involved creating a logo, stationary, style-guide, brochure and a of course a website. To me personally a first impression in what kind of company you’re dealing with starts by looking at the logo. Maybe that’s because of my job, I don’t know, but that’s where my thinking pattern always starts.

A logo is also the centerpiece in what will become the style direction for the rest of the brand identity. From the start of this project it was very clear to me that sharing was the most important aspect. But before I start to talk about that, maybe a little introduction to NetSquared would be in order.

What is NetSquared?

Net2 is an online and offline community created by TechSoup, a project of CompuMentor. The goals are to help hundreds of thousands of non-profit organizations (NPOs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) successfully utilize the community empowering capabilities of the Internet to increase their impact and achieve social change. It was our task to make the website the focal point for the Net2 community's activities. But that's running ahead of ourselves here :)

The logo development.

If you have been following closely you'll remember that sharing and a community feeling was the starting point. At first you would think that such a topic is rather easy, but I can assure you it's not if you want to try to stay as original as possible. When creating a logo I not always start by creating a shape but with finding the right typeface. It was going to be a modern contemporary look so after a lengthy search, I settled for Chalet. This was back in November 2005 and marked the first time that I used Chalet. That's when I also got the idea to use one of the fonts for this blog too.

The next step was trying to incorporate a shape that is as original as possible, not easy especially with such a common theme like networking/sharing. You always have to wary that it hasn't been done before. If I think about networking and remixing the web for social change, first thing that comes to mind is people. So I tried exploring various ideas that contained the thought of sharing and human/social factor. In that process there are always candidates that didn't make it.

Non aproved logos

Non aproved logos Netsquared

Once you have the final shape that you want to use many, permutations follow until you finally get it right. I also like to add that I always start with black and white to get a better idea on how things will look like on a fax for example. But I have to confess that color is always on my mind and that I have a hard time in not thinking about it :) Later in the process NetSquared requested that I worked with bright colors, preferable colors that also appear in the TechSoup logo. My only options in colors where: black, purple, green and orange. So here is the final logo and icon.

Final logo and icon

Final logo and icon Netsquared

Styleguide

When many people are working together on a project it's necessary to introduce a styleguide. We all know that people have a different taste and perception. If there isn't a guide that they can turn to you'll end up with a war zone of typefaces and colors that will make the brand less professional. Below are a few pages from the styleguide we created for NetSquared.

NetSquared styleguide

In the next part I will talk about the challenges that we faced in creating the website, like when the marketing people come in and wants everything on the homepage ;)


36served

gravatar

1

permalink this comment william doyle Thu May 4, 2006 at 07.10 am

Veerle,

This is really awesome. I love some of your logo concepts. You are really so creative. I was wondering if you couldn’t show the style guide in a little bit more detail. I am about to develop my first style guide for a company and I would love to see more clearly how other professionals (especially ones i look up to, like you) go about it. Anyways, this is really awesome. Keep up the great work!

William Doyle


gravatar

2

permalink this comment Blair Christopher Thu May 4, 2006 at 07.39 am

Perfect! As usual.

I noticed a little Ubuntu influence there if I am not mistaken. I also would love to see this in more detail as I have taken on a lot of branding jobs at my company and would love to get more influence.


gravatar

3

permalink this comment BVV Thu May 4, 2006 at 07.53 am

Great job !

I like the colors and the organic aspect.

I prefer the logo without the shadow, like in the orange area in top-left corner of the guidelines.


gravatar

4

permalink this comment skip wiley Thu May 4, 2006 at 08.04 am

Time to de-lurk!  Your work is simply amazing.  As one who aspires to move into this field, your page stands at the top of my inspirational hot-spots.


gravatar

5

permalink this comment Marc Köhlbrugge Thu May 4, 2006 at 09.33 am

Thanks for sharing Veerle, I cant wait for the second part.

Too bad not everybody uses the styleguide (see netsquared logo):
http://www.compumentor.org/


gravatar

6

permalink this comment Veerle Thu May 4, 2006 at 09.51 am

william doyle said:

I was wondering if you couldn’t show the style guide in a little bit more detail.

I’m sorry but I’m afraid that is as far as it goes. I think I show you enough to get some idea ;)

Blair Christopher said:

I noticed a little Ubuntu influence there if I am not mistaken.

Well I didn’t know Ubuntu back then, so believe it or not I wasn’t influenced by it. So that is EXACTLY what I was trying to explain how difficult it is to stay as original as possible. Chances are it’s done before, certainly with a subject of ‘people’, ‘sharing’ etc.

@Mark Marc Köhlbrugge, I know, I just saw that one too, ggrrr… Oh well I’ll notify them ;)


gravatar

7

permalink this comment Damien Tanner Thu May 4, 2006 at 10.10 am

Interesting insight and brilliant work.


gravatar

8

permalink this comment Stefan Seiz Thu May 4, 2006 at 01.40 pm

Ah, now we know where the just recently redesigned Quark Logo disappeared to. Here it is, sitting right on top of “net” ;-) Just kidding Verle!

In case you didn’t follow the Quark redesign nightmare.

Honestly, i am just kidding, the world doesn’t offer enough different shapes so that one will never look somehow similar than another eventualy…


gravatar

9

permalink this comment Poncho Thu May 4, 2006 at 02.47 pm

Hi Veerle,

Really interesting article, thanks for sharing your experiences.

As a web developer I’ve been told I have the creativity of a brick, but I’m REALLY good at observation :p I’m not too good at coming up with concepts and symbolic logos and such but I am often tasked with putting bits together in a manner that doesn’t look like it was done by a programmer :) I guess you have the rare balance of logic AND creativity.

I have to say, on the non-approved logos, I particularly like the second down on the left.

Thanks again;
Poncho


gravatar

10

permalink this comment william doyle Thu May 4, 2006 at 04.08 pm

Hi Veerle,

Thanks for your reply… Maybe if you can’t show me a closer look at the style guide (which I totally understand), you could give me some insight into what I really wanted to know. Beyond, logotype (and usage), colors and typography, what do you include in a style guide? I haven’t put one together before and since my clients have entrusted the project to me, I would really like to deliver, at least, the industry standard, but hopefully something greater.

Thanks

William


gravatar

11

permalink this comment Colin Thu May 4, 2006 at 05.26 pm

Love everything. Originality is easy. Being unique isn’t. Two days ago, I was working on a site template and came up with an idea for the navigation. Once I got a working version, I loved it.

Then yesterday I start looking at djangoproject.com, and voila! they have the exact same main navigation style, just with different colors.


gravatar

12

permalink this comment Ryan Thu May 4, 2006 at 06.46 pm

I think it’s great that your giving everyone a glimpse into your process for branding and the initial design process. And, yes, it is hard not to “step on others’ toes”.


gravatar

13

permalink this comment Robert Mudhuwiwa Fri May 5, 2006 at 12.12 am

Hi Veerle

This subject sounds awesome. I had been thinking of doing something similar but on a much smaller scale. I will definately be keeping tabs on your project. Good Luck

Rob


gravatar

14

permalink this comment Stijn De Lathouwer Fri May 5, 2006 at 01.37 am

From personal experience, I know how hard it is to design something original and fitting for things as broad as ‘community’ or ‘communication’

I especially like the combination with pattern-backgrounds I see in the styleguide. Do the patterns signify different parts of net squared?


gravatar

15

permalink this comment Veerle Fri May 5, 2006 at 01.54 am

william doyle said:

Beyond, logotype (and usage), colors and typography, what do you include in a style guide?

Nothing much actually. You’ve almost summed it all up ;) For Net2 I delivered the styleguide in 2 phases. The last phase included some examples of ads and examples of just text, with a title and subtitle. I also describe and explain what is shown on each page. For the colors I show the proportion between the usage of green and orange and black & white.

Stijn De Lathouwer said:

I especially like the combination with pattern-backgrounds I see in the styleguide. Do the patterns signify different parts of net squared?

No not really, it’s just to represent the usage on different types of backgrounds.


gravatar

16

permalink this comment gina Fri May 5, 2006 at 03.15 am

this is fantastic, veerle.  from netsquared, i just want to say thanks for creating such an attractive site and now letting everyone into the process.  and thanks for not mentioning the fact that we gave you ridiculous requests, like “can you make it warmer—and more cutting edge”. which i still can’t believe you actually fulfilled perfectly.


gravatar

17

permalink this comment Koen De Vreeze Fri May 5, 2006 at 03.26 am

Hello Veerle,

It’s really nice that you’re sharing so much information about what web-designing and making a corporate identity is all about.

I’m a student Multimedia and Communication Technology. Some lessons covered this matter too, but a real life example like this is much more valuable than theory.

So thanks very much :)


gravatar

18

permalink this comment bob Fri May 5, 2006 at 09.07 am

Great description of your process.  Very helpful!

I can’t wait for the next post about “home page content creep”.
How come everyone likes a slick design and then they want to dump content to muck it up?


gravatar

19

permalink this comment motherduce Fri May 5, 2006 at 01.46 pm

Excellent article. Very nice concept design and logo. As always, I appreciate the insight - keep them coming!


gravatar

20

permalink this comment Michelle Flynn Sat May 6, 2006 at 04.17 am

Veerle, did you use the same matrix method to create the top navigation on the netsquared website as you did on your own site?


gravatar

21

permalink this comment Olav Sat May 6, 2006 at 12.38 pm

Great stuff, looking forward to your next entry on the subject. :)


gravatar

22

permalink this comment Ani Sat May 6, 2006 at 08.28 pm

Very interesting and inspiring, as everything else on your website. Thanks for sharing all of this!

Absolutely agree with that last sentence:
“...when the marketing people come in and wants everything on the homepage.”

Can’t wait for Part II.


gravatar

23

permalink this comment Alan Sun May 7, 2006 at 06.43 am

Your blog is fantastic - really keep up the good work


gravatar

24

permalink this comment A. J. Liptak Sun May 7, 2006 at 03.21 pm

Hi, Veerle,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on your projects.

Very silly question, but in what format do you present the Styleguide to your team? I guess the obvious answer would be HTML, etc. But then I thought, perhaps printed? Or PowerPoint?


gravatar

25

permalink this comment Veerle Sun May 7, 2006 at 05.25 pm

A.J. Liptak said

Very silly question, but in what format do you present the Styleguide to your team?

I always use PDF for that because it most likely that everybody will have the free reader on their PC or Mac and it’s better for printing.


gravatar

26

permalink this comment Mark Forrester Mon May 8, 2006 at 06.27 am

Love the idea of the styleguide. Never thought about adding that with the finalised logo design for a client. Makes perfect sense. Too many times the client changes the colour of the logo, or adds some terrible drop shadow to it. It gives off a false reflection of your work.

Defintely a lesson to be learnt here.


gravatar

27

permalink this comment P.J. Onori Mon May 8, 2006 at 10.50 am

I’m curious about the concept behind the logo. How did you come to this form and what does it represent?

I really enjoy hearing about the process people go through to get from concept to product.


gravatar

28

permalink this comment mikeholley Tue May 9, 2006 at 07.52 pm

Hello Veerle,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experiences on the redesign and the use of Expression Engine. I look forward to reviewing “part 3”.

I thought I would mention that there is a style guide example in the book CSS Mastery.


gravatar

29

permalink this comment Rene Kleizen Wed May 10, 2006 at 01.59 pm

Very nice article veerle. It is nice to read things about other peoples work.
I like the logo and icon, etc, by the way.


gravatar

30

permalink this comment k3vin Mon May 15, 2006 at 09.54 am

delurk time for me too… this and other articles are so inspiring, thanks for taking time out to help others!

:K


gravatar

31

permalink this comment A. J. Mon May 22, 2006 at 02.36 pm

Always nice to receive public kudos.

Great job, Veerle!


gravatar

32

permalink this comment billy b Wed May 24, 2006 at 02.26 am

thanks for the head’s up about proper use of logo on http://www.compumentor.org, Marc.

Veerle,
Please don’t be shy about letting us know when we’re butchering your wonderful work-- I can promise that misuse of your work is never a case of disrespect, but a sad case of design-ignorance on our part.

Thanks for understanding,
-bb


gravatar

33

permalink this comment Veerle Wed May 24, 2006 at 12.43 pm

@billy, hehe ‘butchering’? Now that sounds a bit drastic ;) I know it’s just a matter of ignorance and I understand. I promise I’ll send you an e-mail in the future to let you know when I see something not OK. Thanks caring about this and keeping an eye on it for me. That’s much appreciated ;)


gravatar

34

permalink this comment Peter Fri Jun 23, 2006 at 02.20 am

Thanks for sharing your experiences… Can you give me the name of the font in the non aproved logos, first row 2. typo?

Best regards
Peter


gravatar

35

permalink this comment Aaron Sat Jun 24, 2006 at 06.59 am

Waow, great stuff - it’s interesting to see how to lay out the final piece, of course everyone has a different style. May I ask, was that font from the “House Industries” collection of fonts? I think i remember seeing it there.


gravatar

36

permalink this comment Veerle Sat Jun 24, 2006 at 07.45 am

Peter said:

Can you give me the name of the font in the non aproved logos, first row 2. typo?

It’s a font from Veer. At that time I only experimented with this font and draw this by hand with the pen tool in Illustrator (since the name is pretty short). In case the client would choose the logo I would have bought the font. It was Karl Wide if I’m not mistaken.

Aaron said:

Was that font from the “House Industries” collection of fonts?

Yes that’s correct. I’ve actually written an article about this font family. It’s Chalet London 1970.



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Flickrness

buy something from my Amazon wishlist