Dec 05

Microsoft tweaks IE to shield itself from liability

2005 at 11.32 am posted by Veerle

Remember the Eolas patent an ongoing court struggle between Microsoft and the University of California? After two years Microsoft is now changing the way Internet Explorer handles ActiveX controls like for example the Flash plugin and Java applets. In 2003 the changes proposed were pretty disruptive since you needed to click an OK on a alert window every time a flash movie was loading.

Michael Wallent, general manager of Microsoft’s Windows Client division described the change now as “minor” and explained that the extra mouse click would only be necessary if the user wanted to interact with the ActiveX control. So users cannot directly interact with Microsoft ActiveX controls loaded by the APPLET, EMBED, or OBJECT elements, they have activate their interface first. The white paper about it can be found here

For example when you open a page that uses Windows Media Player to play a movie or music file, the music/movie plays after the page loads but you can not interact with the interface unless you activate it as shown in the picture.

Activating the user interface
When a page consist of several objects they all can be activated with one click. Instead of non-stop dialog boxes as first proposed, the page will load normally and won’t be as disruptive. It will only require a click to activate if the user wants to interact with it. Wallent also said “the vast majority of sites and users won’t be affected and that it is significantly less intrusive than what we originally planned to do”.

Microsoft is still convinced it will triumph but the changes are being made to shield them from liability. We will have to wait and see just how this outcome will affect us. My motto is I’ll believe it’s less intrusive when I see it. The update is coming in January.


9served

gravatar

1

permalink this comment Andrew Mon Dec 5, 2005 at 01.13 pm

It’s still a little obnoxious. Sounds like it’s still one required click before anything much happens. Would you have to click to just *watch* something? Does “viewing” count as “interacting”?

I forget, was Apple also the target of a similar suit? Will other browsers eventually have to do something similar? 


gravatar

2

permalink this comment Ronald Poi Mon Dec 5, 2005 at 08.56 pm

I still found this useless… i have to fight with ie to show my swf files when i test my flash movies…


gravatar

3

permalink this comment Veerle Tue Dec 6, 2005 at 02.29 am

@Andrew: No, viewing would work when the page loads, but you can’t use the controls until you click. Apple isn’t a target of a similar suit because MacOS X doesn’t use ActiveX. I’m not 100% sure about other browsers but I think Firefox isn’t a target for the suit. As I understand it there is a license that is royalty-free for non-commercial usage.


gravatar

4

permalink this comment jean-christophe Tue Dec 6, 2005 at 03.09 am

“As I understand it there is a license that is royalty-free for non commercial usage.”

@Veerle: There’s something i don’t quite really get here. Isn’t IE a free app and a free platform to develop apps (web-apps)? Even though what is being developed can be commercial.


gravatar

5

permalink this comment Veerle Tue Dec 6, 2005 at 04.03 am

@jean-christophe: IE isn’t a free app since it comes bundled with Windows and you can’t run it without it. The same is true for Safari on MacOS X.


gravatar

6

permalink this comment koen Tue Dec 6, 2005 at 04.05 am

Fact is, if everyone starts waving with patents to brake competition, the web will never be the same. And this Eolas case is just a small one. I wonder if things will get out of control or the relative status quo we have now will stay.


gravatar

7

permalink this comment jean-christophe Tue Dec 6, 2005 at 08.18 am

@Veerle: But IE was made available for free for the macos9 platform and there even was an unix version planned (don’t know if it ever was released) back in the ie4 years. Moreoever, you can freely download ie 5.5 to install it on a win95/98 system. In those examples IE isn’t bought with a bundle. Those characteristics are puzzling me about the real “free” nature of IE - maybe there have to be considered as “upgrades”?


gravatar

8

permalink this comment vanni Wed Dec 7, 2005 at 03.26 pm

Safari is free but only for mac OS X. IE is now only free for windows platform (not withstanding the feeble IE that _used_ to be on the mac). On the other hand Firefox is free everywhere: OS X , unix, and Win. For me there is no more room for the FREE and useless IE. Time to send it to the software graveyard, before it does more damage to the internet.  M$ marketing has broken the spirit of web standards with IE. And they continue to create many win/web apps that NEED IE to function. Encouarging this kind of behaviour is damaging to all of us who respect the free open internet. Ju t say NO to IE! N. O. no…


gravatar

9

permalink this comment Daniel Wood Sun Dec 18, 2005 at 05.20 pm

Hmm, I wonder how this effects the new flash ‘externalinterface’ command.  I was planning to use a hidden swf file to play music seamlessly accross my website and use externalinterface to control it from my webpage.. how will this affect the hidden swf I wonder..



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Flickrness

buy something from my Amazon wishlist