Sep 29

Illustrator madness part II

2004 at 05.03 am posted by Veerle

Via kottke these stunning photorealistic drawings in Illustrator popped up. After the amazing cruise ship from Kevin Hulsey another fine piece of art that makes me dream of applying gradient meshes. A whole lot of patience is also needed to create such a drawing.  You can view the drawing in outline to figure out how it was done. First class stuff!
Some mighty fine Illustrator art


7served

gravatar

1

permalink this comment AkaXakA Wed Sep 29, 2004 at 07.17 am

I just can’t believe this was done all by hand…
Couldn’t you just program something to convert all the curves to paths and then fill them up with the corresponding colours?

But be it by hand or by program...wow!


gravatar

2

permalink this comment Stephen Wed Sep 29, 2004 at 07.28 am

As Bert Monroy would say, It’s not about finding an easier way by just taking a photo but the process and understanding to create realistic photos from scratch. 


gravatar

3

permalink this comment Patrick Wed Sep 29, 2004 at 09.22 am

These people should learn Maya or Softimage to create these images, they could be used in real 3D with camera view and lighting sets.


gravatar

4

permalink this comment Kim Siever Wed Sep 29, 2004 at 03.30 pm

I agree with Stephen. Admittedly, I am guilty of trying to find the easy way to accomplish certain tasks. At the same time, there are instances where I have been known to work for hours on one task in order to make it look as realistic as possible.

There’s some pleasure in reinventing the wheel from scratch.


gravatar

5

permalink this comment Erik Mon Oct 4, 2004 at 05.22 am

I’d seen this site before it was linked here (it was linked somewhere else ... I can’t recall where) and my first reaction was awe.

I couldn’t believe they were done in illustrator—especially that motorcycle outside the building. Those artists are incredibly talented.

After the inital awe wore off, my reaction was closer to “why?”. It must be cheaper to do a photo, or, if the product doesn’t exist (or the location doesn’t exist) then using a 3D program must be faster.

I suppose showing off for the sake of showing off is fine, but it does make me wonder what possesses people to do this in the first place.

Or—since I have no 3D software experience—is it faster/easier to do this (for these guys) in illustrator? Anyone? Just curious.

- Erik


gravatar

6

permalink this comment Andreas Wed Dec 8, 2004 at 07.28 am

In some situations it is better to have photorealistic vector artwork. Large format prints for outside advertising (giant posters) are a good example. Bitmap data required to print these has to be incredibly large while vectors don’t take more processing power or storage space depending on output size. I came across some product images that were vectorized to great detail (though not as realistic as the pictures in this post) just because it was easier to transmit and to print.


gravatar

7

permalink this comment Jordan Tue Dec 27, 2005 at 01.51 pm

Patrick: Doing this in 3D would probably be easier and more flexible, but I’ve never seen a 3D human look as good as a gradient-meshed one



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Flickrness

buy something from my Amazon wishlist