Nov 09

How to screw your potential buyers

2005 at 11.38 pm posted by Veerle Pieters

Yes the lords of the music industry are at again, this time in The Netherlands (and don’t get me started on the Stichting Thuiskopie). Geert and I are listeners of the Daily Source Code from Adam Curry and we love the Mashups, Hit Test from Jan Polet or the Backtracks Podcast Quiz. A fun way to give our brains a good workout.

We will sue you if you play licensed music

Mashups is the mixing of two different songs so that it perfectly blends into one. The Hit Test is an amazing quality quiz (production wise) where you have to guess very short sound-clips from the 80's and Backtracks Podcast Quiz is the same scenario but the songs play in reverse. A perfect setting to renew your interest in music. On several occasions I've bought songs that we're played on the Hit Test. I'm sure I wasn't the only one doing that! Such a beautiful way to make people interested in back catalog. But like many good things it must come to an end because of some vulture that smells lost of income. Adam has had several threats from Dutch organizations and is now completely switching over to Podsafe music. A new way for artists to get their music to listeners of podcasts.

I do not know all the details but from what I understand of it there was the goodwill of the BUMA/STEMRA, but the NVPI (de vereniging van de platen- en muziekwinkels) found it was necessary that before playing a record on your podcast the record company must be notified. End result is that the different organizations can't reach an agreement and it is goodbye those lovely items mentioned above.

This example isn't an exception but it is one of many writings on the wall that leaders of the music industry still don't get it. They also have no intension of modifying their business model so that it fits today's needs. In fact they fall back to scary tactics like installing a so called Rootkit like Sony BMG is doing with some of their 2005 CDs. Another example is the tiff that Steve Jobs has with some of the record labels in the negotiations. They want a higher price for most of the songs in the iTunes Music Store like 1,5 Euro. Here is what Edgar Bronfman Jr., the CEO of Warner Music Group had to say about that:

"That's not to say we want to raise prices across the board or that we don't believe in a 99 cent price point for most music. But there are some songs for which consumers would be willing to pay more. And some we'd be willing to sell for less."

He did even take it a step further:

"We are selling our songs through iPod, but we don't have a share of iPod's revenue. We want to share in those revenue streams. We have to get out of the mindset that our content has promotional value only."

Well Mr. Bronfman come up with some clever ideas of your own instead trying the easy route. Your company is struggling now just because you've missed the boat entirely. If my business model sucks tomorrow and I run into to hot water should I start blaming other web agencies and asked a cut from their revenue? No I shouldn't be so stupid to let it slip that far instead.

I buy a lot of songs in the ITMS (232 since the launch in Belgium in October 2004) because of the fact that it only costs 0,99 Euro and is so easy. If prices rise I would stop doing that for sure. And be honest do you really think a smash hit from 80's for example would sell for less? I don't think so, a huge hit would probably cost more instead. I love the simplicity of the 0,99 Euro model and I also believe it is essential in keeping the ITMS a success to keep people away from P2P. The ITMS is still in the early stages of a new market and simplicity is the key. Changing that would be like killing the chicken with golden eggs.

The status quo players are fighting for their survival while the emerging initiatives like Apple iTunes Store, The Podsafe Music Network and the many popular Podcasters are flourishing. The ground is shaking under the Music labels and they have no idea what to do, instead they are delving their own grave. If they are that greedy then I shout "Dead to the (BIG) labels" :-p

I only have one more thing to say to the record labels start trusting your customers we are not all thieves!


11served

gravatar

1

permalink this comment Pat Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 02.08 am

Well said! ;-) and I think Steve Jobs did a great job when he managed to keep all songs at .99 in spite of the pressure of the music labels.


gravatar

2

permalink this comment Geoffrey Sneddib Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 04.53 am

Another thing Adam said well was who on earth is going to steal the music from his, or anybody’s podcast. The encoding/sound quality is just so bad. With the mashups, hit tests and backtracks you never got the whole song anyway, so how can you steal them from that?


gravatar

3

permalink this comment Raven Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 09.13 am

It’s becoming crazier and crazier all the time…


gravatar

4

permalink this comment vanni Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 12.18 pm

ITMS broke new ground. the music execs were asleep, and now that they have been shaken awake they wish to put the genie back in the bottle! No way, no how. The distribution model is for ever changed. I for one will never again pay more than .99E for a song.  Imagine charging 21EURO for a cd!! When I can get it for 9.99EURO on itms. (this was the case last week when I was in italy… hi-way robbery!). And I would much more prefer to pay a fair price rather than free downloads. PS Mr Bronfman’s family made their fortunes on booze, esp during the probabtion on liquor sales in the US. Ironic that he now covets a share of the iPod...that magical distributor of “cheap musical hooch"…


gravatar

5

permalink this comment Joe Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 01.19 pm

Record companies suck. You’re right...they missed the boat entirely. Now they want to take it to the consumer for their shortcomings. Ughh!


gravatar

6

permalink this comment Askar Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 02.41 pm

What is the font that you’ve used on that image? It looks clear/crisp. Please let me know. Thanks.
- Askar


gravatar

7

permalink this comment Jochem D. Donkers Thu Nov 10, 2005 at 03.09 pm

I am the CEO of Philips and I got a call from Mr Bronfman. He told me that it was unfair that he did not receive any share of Philip’s revenues from CD-player (et All.) sales.

Veerle, you work a lot with the internet. How do you think that a band can communicate (market) their music to a global audience, and then not only the lead users like you and me? What are the most promising communications plans? Anybody a good idea?


gravatar

8

permalink this comment Gerard McGarry Fri Nov 11, 2005 at 02.26 am

I think we need a new model entirely, a radicak rethinking of the music industry from top to bottom.

The big players just don’t understand the potential for Internet distribution. We need someone with drive and ability to take on acts and promote them via the web.

The large labels are frustrating artistic creativity, suiing fans for copyright infringement and generally losing touch with their customer base.

Anybody got ideas for an alternative, fairer system?


gravatar

9

permalink this comment Veerle Fri Nov 11, 2005 at 01.22 pm

@Jochem and Gerard: I think that the podsafe music network is a great start for new bands. My initial thought was that the music there would be awfull but I was wrong there is a lot of talent in there. Ok, maybe too much rock for my taste but it’s still early days. I think that network has great potential and the artist or band has insight in who is playing his or her music.

I don’t listen to regular radio anymore.


gravatar

10

permalink this comment promethee Thu Nov 17, 2005 at 01.25 am

I definitely agree with the content of this post....Well said! :)


gravatar

11

permalink this comment Veerle Thu Nov 17, 2005 at 07.25 am

@Askar, I"ve used Myriad Roman (22pt ‘Sharp’ Photoshop type rendering with a light sharp drop shadow). Hope this helps.



Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Flickrness

buy something from my Amazon wishlist